#	Team	MP	W	L	TP	Pts	Form
1.	Horsens	5	4	1	432:397	8
2.	Randers	5	3	2	480:424	6
3.	Bakken Bears	5	3	2	448:400	6
4.	Svendborg	5	3	2	394:392	6
5.	Team FOG Naestved	5	2	3	433:508	4
6.	Copenhagen	5	0	5	390:456	0

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	TP	Pts	Form
1.	Bakken Bears	10	6	4	912:817	12
2.	Horsens	10	6	4	854:820	12
3.	Team FOG Naestved	10	6	4	913:985	12
4.	Randers	10	5	5	923:891	10
5.	Svendborg	10	5	5	804:808	10
6.	Copenhagen	10	2	8	825:910	4

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	TP	Pts	Form
1.	Svendborg	15	10	5	1323:1163	20
2.	Bakken Bears	15	10	5	1412:1260	20
3.	Team FOG Naestved	15	10	5	1434:1447	20
4.	Randers	15	8	7	1393:1335	16
5.	Horsens	15	8	7	1313:1265	16
6.	Copenhagen	15	4	11	1280:1377	8

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	TP	Pts	Form
1.	Bakken Bears	20	15	5	1933:1618	30
2.	Svendborg	20	14	6	1793:1535	28
3.	Team FOG Naestved	20	14	6	1957:1883	28
4.	Randers	20	12	8	1863:1757	24
5.	Horsens	20	12	8	1738:1645	24
6.	Copenhagen	20	6	14	1702:1770	12

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	TP	Pts	Form
1.	Bakken Bears	25	19	6	2411:1992	38
2.	Team FOG Naestved	25	19	6	2516:2312	38
3.	Svendborg	25	18	7	2268:1890	36
4.	Randers	25	16	9	2306:2160	32
5.	Horsens	25	15	10	2171:2041	30
6.	Copenhagen	25	11	14	2128:2160	22

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	TP	Pts	Form
1.	Bakken Bears	30	24	6	2982:2354	48
2.	Team FOG Naestved	30	23	7	3059:2738	46
3.	Svendborg	30	22	8	2741:2275	44
4.	Horsens	30	20	10	2590:2391	40
5.	Randers	30	19	11	2785:2584	38
6.	Copenhagen	30	13	17	2598:2597	26

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH