#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Santiago de Cuba	5	5	0	63:35	1.000
2.	Industriales	5	4	1	25:19	0.800
3.	Las Tunas	5	3	2	47:41	0.600
4.	Ciego de Avila	5	2	3	22:24	0.400
5.	Granma	5	2	3	35:48	0.400
6.	Pinar del Rio	5	2	3	24:41	0.400

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Santiago de Cuba	10	7	3	96:60	0.700
2.	Industriales	10	6	4	44:47	0.600
3.	Ciego de Avila	10	4	6	49:44	0.400
4.	Las Tunas	10	4	6	83:93	0.400
5.	Pinar del Rio	10	3	7	53:88	0.300
6.	Granma	10	3	7	57:94	0.300

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Santiago de Cuba	15	9	6	123:85	0.600
2.	Industriales	15	8	7	73:80	0.533
3.	Ciego de Avila	15	7	8	69:62	0.467
4.	Las Tunas	15	7	8	120:114	0.467
5.	Pinar del Rio	15	6	9	79:115	0.400
6.	Granma	15	6	9	78:115	0.400

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Las Tunas	20	11	9	172:144	0.550
2.	Ciego de Avila	20	11	9	94:76	0.550
3.	Industriales	20	11	9	103:112	0.550
4.	Santiago de Cuba	20	10	10	148:113	0.500
5.	Granma	20	8	12	117:153	0.400
6.	Pinar del Rio	20	7	13	96:140	0.350

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Ciego de Avila	25	15	10	123:101	0.600
2.	Las Tunas	25	14	11	191:161	0.560
3.	Santiago de Cuba	25	13	12	182:143	0.520
4.	Industriales	25	12	13	133:147	0.480
5.	Granma	25	11	14	147:182	0.440
6.	Pinar del Rio	25	10	15	123:165	0.400

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Las Tunas	30	18	12	223:178	0.600
2.	Ciego de Avila	30	17	13	136:128	0.567
3.	Santiago de Cuba	30	16	14	223:175	0.533
4.	Industriales	30	14	16	164:182	0.467
5.	Pinar del Rio	30	13	17	151:189	0.433
6.	Granma	30	12	18	160:205	0.400

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH